regulation
14 briefs
Canada Wants to Label AI Content. The Problem Is Everything Is AI Content Now.
A House of Commons committee wants mandatory labels on AI-generated material. The recommendation is reasonable. The implementation problem is that the boundary between AI-assisted and AI-generated has already dissolved.
Parliament Voted Down the Ban. Starmer Called Tech CEOs Into Downing Street Anyway.
The UK government rejected an immediate social media ban for under-16s while simultaneously signaling it might do exactly that. The question is not whether it happens but who has to take the credit.
AI Companies Trained on Artists' Work. Now Everyone Is Arguing About Who Owns What.
The Supreme Court declined to rule on AI-generated copyright. Anthropic settled with authors for $1.5 billion. Chicken Soup for the Soul sued eight AI companies at once. The law has not kept up.
The First State to Say No to AI
Maine just passed the nation's first statewide moratorium on AI data centers. The governor hasn't signed it yet, and that's where the real story begins.
The Ban That Moves Children Underground
Australia's under-16 social media ban has failed: two-thirds of affected teens are still on banned platforms. The UK and Massachusetts are about to copy the same approach.
Regulate the Machine or Regulate the Person
Both parties want to regulate AI but disagree on the target: Republicans want to control how the technology is built; Democrats want to control how individuals misuse it. The difference is not semantic.
The Under-16 Consensus
The US House, Canada's Liberal Party, Australia's eSafety regulator, and Massachusetts have all moved this week to restrict or ban children's social media use. The policy idea has gone global. The implementation gap is enormous.
Two Parties, Two Theories of What AI Is
Both parties want to regulate AI, but they disagree on whether the problem is the technology itself or what people do with it, and that gap cannot be bridged.
The Law That Teenagers Broke in a Week
Australia's under-16 social media ban has been in force for four months. The regulator says platforms are failing. A 15-year-old named Noah is fighting it in court. Both things can be true.
The EPA Just Declared It Has No Legal Authority Over Climate Change
Revoking the 2009 endangerment finding does not disprove climate science. It just removes the government's legal obligation to act on it.
OpenAI Is Backing a Bill That Would Let It Cause Mass Death Without Full Liability. This Week It Got Sued for Causing a Stalking.
SB 3444 shields AI firms from damages in catastrophic harm cases, if they publish safety reports. The same week OpenAI endorsed it, a lawsuit dropped alleging ChatGPT deepened a man's delusions until he stalked a woman.
Banks Spent Two Years Lobbying to Ban Stablecoin Yield. The White House Just Proved Their Numbers Don't Add Up.
The CLARITY Act was almost derailed by bank lobbying to prohibit stablecoin yield. A new White House analysis finds the ban would boost bank lending by 0.02% while costing consumers $800 million. The banks are protecting something other than what they claimed.
The EPA Deleted the Legal Foundation for Every Federal Climate Rule. Zeldin Called It 'Vindication.'
The 2009 endangerment finding was not a regulation. it was the scientific warrant that made regulation possible. Repealing it doesn't just kill pending rules; it retroactively questions whether any climate regulation was ever lawful.
Zero Federal AI Laws, 1,561 State Bills, and a White House Framework Nobody Has to Follow
The US has no binding AI law while the EU enforces its Act across 27 countries. The federal-state collision is now the biggest AI governance story in the world.